The import of NR into the country has been on
an increasing trend. In 2009, total NR import has
exceeded 730,000 tonnes. Export has however
declined to about 700,000 tonnes. With the decline
in rubber cultivation, not only is the export revenue
decreasing, but equally worrying is the growing
dependence of the downstream sector on import.
This may not be sustainable because as soon as
the other producing countries start expanding
downstream, they will have less latex concentrate
for export. This means Malaysia’s latex products
sector will be adversely affected.
It has been predicted that in 2018, the world rubber
consumption will reach 28 million tonnes. NR share
is expected to increase to about 50% in 2018. 65.5
% of NR consumption is now in Asia. China leads
the NR consumption in Asia. 80% NR end up in
tyres where Asia is now a dominant market for NR.
So the question of lack of demand does not arise
at all. But supply may face challenges. There are
constraints on further yield improvement. Climate
change is one factor. There is now more rainy days,
higher morning temperatures affecting latex flow,
extended wintering days and the emergence of
new diseases. All these will contribute towards the
growing tightening of supply. This may have been
partly responsible for the high prices.
How can we arrest the decline in the rubber areas
in Malaysia? The industry may have to rethink its
policies to drive the growth of the rubber business.
Malaysia is now behind Thailand and Indonesia in
NR production. In fact very soon the production in
India may also exceed Malaysia’s. Though oil palm
has taken most of the areas earlier under NR, there
are still sizable areas available. There are areas in
the dryer North where oil palms do not perform
as well. Why aren’t big plantations venturing there?
For that matter, why aren’t big rubber plantation

houses venturing into Indonesia and the other
emerging rubber growing countries? They do that
in oil palm but not rubber. Why? At the same time
we see China and even Vietnam already looking
beyond their borders to plant NR.
The focus should be on new and unique downstream
technologies in latex products and the dry rubber
products which will strengthen Malaysia’s position
as the place to manufacture rubber-based products.
The Malaysian NR industry should capitalise on
the growing green consumerism movement in the
world. Modification work on NR, whether chemical
or biological, should be a useful research area not
only to develop new materials but also to improve
the properties of NR vis-a-vis competing materials
such as synthetics. The rubberwood sector, now
an important revenue earner for the industry,
needs careful planning to further strengthen the
sector. These would include the forest plantation
programme and other process improvement
research.

Research in the basic science of NR and also the
non-rubbers in the latex will need a new vigour.
We also need to research new rubber-like materials
which can complement NR in production. For all
you know, it may be another rubber producing
crop. Already we hear of a promising rubber
crop which produces latex without the allegernic
proteins associated with Hevea. We have to explore
this. New breakthroughs in genetic engineering
have made it technically feasible to deploy the
rubber tree as a biofactory for various products
including pharmaceuticals and fuel. The potential
application of nanotechnology to further improve
NR properties calls for serious research. Whatever future of NR in
Malaysia. It would therefore be strategic to establish
a technology intelligence group tasked with the
responsibility to scout for and collate information
on global technology developments related to the
NR industry and undertake the relevant technology
foresight studies.
It is clear that with the emergence of new scientific
tools, NR can harbour new hopes. In fact, with
the right investment in scientific R&D, there is no
reason why the glory days of NR cannot be brought
back.
Back to Insights Area