Foresight and Challenges In Communicating Its Result To Decision Makers PDF Print E-mail

BY Claudio Chauke Nehme, Marcio de Miranda Santos, Lelio Fellows Filho, Gilda Massari Coelho
Centre for Strategic Studies and Management (CGEE)
Catholic University of Brasilia
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it


The Center for Strategic Studies and Management - CGEE is a non-profit Brazilian think tank, created in 2001 and qualified as a Social Organization by the Brazilian President, and supervised by Ministry of Science and Technology, in order to promote Science, Technology and Innovation (ST&I) development to advance economic growth, competitiveness and well-being in Brazil. The scope of CGEE's activities covers three integrated themes: foresight studies; strategic evaluation of large programs and projects; and information and knowledge diffusion related to the Brazilian ST&I System. CGEE is considered an interface organization in the ST&I environment. It has the responsibility of articulating Government, Private Sector, Academia, and other relevant ST&I representatives in the sense of gathering collective understanding to develop its activities. From 2001 to date, CGEE has conducted nearly 400 foresight studies and program/project evaluations, mobilizing more than 2000 experts per year coming from 300 institutions.


This article addresses the challenges of communicating the results of foresight processes to Brazilian decision makers in a way that truly supports their decisions. It stresses the role of intangibles as a central outcome of foresight exercises and the importance to promote out-of-the-box thinking. Lessons learned are presented as well as a case study.



The concept of out-of-the-box thinking adopted by CGEE is related to the Learning Organization Theory (Tosey, 2005). The idea is to establish an oriented process aiming at making decisions or sharing perceptions, free of prejudices, cultural influences, and reasoning processes. This concept requires that experts and other stakeholders think about new possibilities and collectively foresee related approaches, imagine influences and impacts regarding a specific issue. The mindset revision with experts and stakeholders uses mainly qualitative approaches.



High importance and attention is given to the generation of intangibles along the development of strategic foresight exercises. The process of sharing experiences, the collective learning and understanding, the creation of shared commitment on the main decisions to be taken and the shared vision on future possibilities are all intangibles to be pursued. Their value many times surpasses and complements tangible outcomes, such as reports and publications, as they are usually absorbed as knowledge by those participating.




There are some key elements embedded in CGEE's methodological approach. First and most important, stakeholders must be involved in the exercise from the very beginning. They must feel comfortable and confident to participate in all phases, irrespective to the complexities involved. To have them engaged, CGEE’s team must listen, interpret and understand the client’s needs, desires and preoccupations and to describe and translate - to all participants, in an understandable way - the main objectives and strategic goals taking into consideration possibilities, opportunities and different perspectives.


Second, introducing collective intelligence over all phases of the process in a systematic manner is the key for achieving success (Glenn, 2010). In other words, collaboration, interaction and communication are all important, as well as attempts to design and plan the foresight exercise with a sense of anticipation, pointing out the most difficult points and where revisions of mindsets are expected.


The foresight exercises conducted by CGEE comprise three distinct phases, as seen in Figure 1. The Initial Phase establishes the baseline of the exercise, usually mapping what is going on related to the main issue. The Main Phase is where most interpretation of information takes place and creativity is required at the best of the participant’s capacity. Studies, scenario planning, workshops, and electronic tools are applied, among others, in order to revise and transform mindsets, understand possible futures associated to the main issues. In this phase, CGEE intends to build a good decisionmaking process, making it as comprehensive as possible. In the Dissemination Phase the main recommendations are fine-tuned with decision makers in all their aspects and an implementation strategy is first designed.



This topic describes briefly how CGEE recently conducted an organizational foresight exercise for the main federal ST&I funding agency in Brazil – FINEP, also known as the Brazilian Innovation Agency (Coelho, et al., 2011). FINEP's mission is to promote the economic and social development in Brazil through public funding of science, technology and innovation in businesses, universities, technological institutions and other public and private organizations.


The challenge of promoting out-of-the-box thinking was very complex in this case. It required a broad exercise of exploring future perspectives and a systematic process of questioning "what is going on" and "what should we do differently", with the participation of staff and a range of potential beneficiaries and stakeholders. Figure 2 presents the main ideas and designed strategy on how out-of-the-box thinking was implemented at the agency.


The turning point to truly revise its mindset was when FINEP was prepared to visualize its challenges and a feasible strategic position for itself in the future. In other words, to define a challenging, yet successful, Future Vision required a strategy which, on one hand, should balance the knowledge related to the present and some relevant future possibilities, and on the other hand, should compare, contrast and merge the internal and external views.


Read Full Article

Back to Insights Area

 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh